Identity infrastructure for AI agents is transitioning from a peripheral security concern to a foundational layer of AI governance. As enterprises deploy increasingly autonomous agents across cloud, edge, and partner ecosystems, the ability to establish and manage dependable identities for agents—not just humans—becomes central to trust, compliance, and operational resilience. The market is bifurcated between foundational identity services that scale human-centric IAM to multi-agent environments and specialized, agent-centric identity fabrics that unify authentication, authorization, provenance, and governance across heterogeneous runtimes. In 2025 and beyond, we expect the market for AI-agent identity infrastructure to exhibit robust demand driven by the rise of agent networks, demand for verifiable provenance of model decisions, and the imperative to enforce policy across complex supply chains. The opportunity set includes identity fabrics built on decentralized identifiers, verifiable credentials, and runtime attestation, complemented by policy engines, zero-trust enforcement points, and cross-domain trust frameworks. The trajectory implies a multi-year growth cycle with expanding total addressable market as regulated sectors adopt standardized identity primitives for AI agents and as enterprises prefer modular, interoperable solutions over monolithic security stacks. The investment thesis centers on three pillars: first, a scalable identity fabric that binds agent identity to capabilities and resources in real time; second, portable attestations of provenance and state for agents to reduce model risk and improve auditability; and third, governance platforms that translate policy-as-code into enforceable runtime decisions across diverse environments. Early leaders will emerge at the intersection of identity standards, AI governance, and secure execution environments, with substantial upside for platforms that can deliver seamless integration with major AI platforms, cloud providers, and edge compute ecosystems.
The acceleration of AI agent ecosystems—from copilots and autonomous assistants to adaptive workflow agents and cross-organizational orchestrators—has elevated identity from a gatekeeping function to a strategic capability. Traditional identity and access management (IAM) focused on human users and service principals in relatively static environments. By contrast, AI agents operate across dynamic topologies, frequently transient, operating with ephemeral credentials, and interacting with data at varying sensitivity levels. This creates fresh risk vectors around impersonation, credential leakage, policy drift, and supply-chain provenance. The market is thus transitioning toward an identity infrastructure that emphasizes agent-centric authentication, continuous authorization, and runtime attestation, all anchored in verifiable claims that can be cryptographically validated across domains. The standards landscape is evolving in parallel, with DID (decentralized identifiers) and verifiable credentials (VCs) shaping portable identity, while OAuth/OpenID Connect, SPIFFE/SPIRE, and zero-trust frameworks provide the calm technical baseline for secure inter-agent communication. Emerging privacy-preserving techniques, including zero-knowledge proofs for credential verification, are increasingly relevant to ensure that agents can demonstrate compliance without exposing sensitive data. In regulated sectors such as financial services, healthcare, and critical infrastructure, authorities are signaling that agent identity and provenance will be subject to audit, reporting, and cross-border data governance requirements, accelerating demand for auditable, interoperable identity fabrics. The competitive landscape features three layers: cloud-native IAM platforms expanding into AI agent spaces, specialized identity-fabric startups focusing on agent identity with verifiable provenance, and integration layers that connect identity primitives with model governance and runtime attestation. The market is also shaped by supply-chain risk concerns in AI, where ensuring that agents act on trusted model outputs and adhere to governance policies is paramount for risk-adjusted returns. The long-run opportunity includes a shift from point-in-time access controls to continuous, policy-driven identity governance that scales with agent networks and regulatory expectations.
First, the identity fabric for AI agents must unify cross-domain identities with dynamic capability tokens. Agents require a portable identity that persists across platforms while carrying attestations about capabilities, data access permissions, and policy compliance. This requires a layered approach: cryptographic identifiers (DID), verifiable credentials that carry claims about provenance, and secure, runtime attestations that can verify the agent’s integrity and adherence to policy at execution time. Without this integration, enterprises face opaque decision traces, making it difficult to audit agent actions or attribute outcomes to trusted sources. Second, governance and policy enforcement are moving to policy-as-code with automated enforcement points at the edge and in the cloud. Decision engines—whether enforcing access, data handling rules, or model usage constraints—must interpret policies in real time and render enforceable decisions across heterogeneous environments. The ability to compose policies across domains and translate them into machine-actionable rules represents a critical moat for incumbents and a clear entry point for new entrants with strong platform capabilities. Third, provenance and model governance are becoming inseparable from identity. Verifiable credentials can encode attestations about data lineage, model licenses, training data provenance, and the integrity of model updates. This reduces information asymmetry for buyers and regulators, enabling auditable traceability from data ingestion through inference. Fourth, privacy-preserving identity mechanisms are increasingly essential as agents handle sensitive data. Techniques such as selective disclosure and zero-knowledge proofs enable agents to demonstrate compliance without revealing raw data, helping to balance the need for accountability with data minimization and privacy requirements. Fifth, the economics of AI-agent identity will hinge on modular, interoperable components rather than bespoke stacks. Enterprises will prefer identity fabrics that plug into existing security operations centers (SOCs), model governance tools, data catalogs, and cloud-native security services, reducing integration risk and accelerating time to value. The confluence of standardized primitives, policy-enabled governance, and robust runtime attestation points to a scalable, defensible, and highly interoperable market structure, with potential for rapid value capture as agent ecosystems mature and regulatory expectations crystallize.
From an investment perspective, the opportunity lies in early-stage platforms that solve for agent identity at scale, followed by growth-stage bets on governance-enabled runtimes and cross-domain trust networks. Priority bets include: first, identity fabrics that abstract the complexity of cross-environment agent identities and provide a portable, auditable foundation across cloud, edge, and partner networks; second, verifiable credential marketplaces and provenance services that facilitate trust between agents and data sources, including standards-based templates for model licensing, data lineage, and policy adherence; third, runtime attestation and policy enforcement platforms that can operate with low latency in high-throughput AI environments, including secure enclaves and hardware-backed roots of trust; fourth, governance and compliance platforms that translate policy-as-code into automated remediation actions and explainability traces suitable for regulators and board-level oversight. Revenue models are likely to blend subscription-based access to identity fabrics, usage-based charges for credential issuance and verification, and premium offerings around governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) reporting, with potential for ecosystem partnerships with cloud providers, AI platform vendors, and security integrators. The competitive landscape will reward those with strong interoperability, active open standards participation, and a demonstrated track record of reducing identity sprawl and speeding time-to-value for enterprise AI deployments. Risk factors include the pace of standards convergence, the complexity of cross-domain trust, regulatory shifts around data sovereignty and model governance, and the potential for fragmentation if rival platforms fail to interoperate or lock-in customers. Given these dynamics, a balanced portfolio approach—covering foundational identity fabrics, provenance-enabled modules, and governance platforms—appears prudent, with overweight exposure to teams delivering interoperable, standards-aligned capabilities that integrate into existing security operations and AI governance stacks.
In the base case, AI agent ecosystems gain traction through large-scale deployments in regulated industries and enterprise functions, with identity fabrics becoming a standard layer of the infrastructure stack. Adoption occurs gradually as vendors align to evolving standards, interoperable credential models, and policy-as-code tooling. In this trajectory, the market expands steadily, cross-domain trust networks mature, and customers experience measurable reductions in supervision costs, audit effort, and data-privacy risk. A more optimistic upside scenario envisions rapid convergence around universal identity primitives for AI agents, accelerated by regulatory clarity and compelling returns from end-to-end governance workflows. In this world, agent networks become highly distributed yet tightly governed, with verifiable provenance buffers and widespread use of privacy-preserving proofs enabling cross-border collaboration without compromising sensitive data. Revenue growth accelerates, and specialized identity-aware security platforms become essential components of AI deployments, attracting investment attention from both traditional security incumbents and nimble startups. A downside scenario centers on fragmentation and misalignment among standards, resulting in siloed ecosystems and interoperability challenges that constrain scale and increase integration risk. If policy requirements outpace technical convergence, or if regulatory regimes diverge significantly across jurisdictions, enterprises may delay or re-architect AI deployments, diminishing the near-term appeal of identity-focused platforms. Another potential risk is a misalignment between identity governance and the practical performance needs of real-time AI agents, where heavy attestation overhead could impact latency and throughput. In all scenarios, the sensitivity of AI agents to identity integrity and policy compliance ensures that the core value proposition remains robust, but the pace and breadth of adoption will be determined by standardization, interoperability, and the perceived cost of governance versus risk exposure.
Conclusion
Identity infrastructure for AI agents represents a tectonic shift in how organizations architect, deploy, and govern autonomous capabilities. The convergence of decentralized identity primitives, verifiable provenance, and policy-driven enforcement creates a scalable, auditable, and privacy-conscious framework for agent ecosystems. The market is characterized by a clear demand imperative from regulated sectors, a path to scalable monetization through modular identity fabrics and governance platforms, and a risk-adjusted return profile that rewards interoperability and standards alignment. For investors, the rationale is to back foundational platforms that reduce agent identity complexity at scale, while capturing the optionality embedded in governance, provenance, and cross-domain trust. The path forward is anchored in continued standards development, aggressive integration with existing AI and cloud ecosystems, and a disciplined focus on reducing identity sprawl, improving auditability, and delivering measurable risk-adjusted outcomes. As AI agents proliferate and governance expectations intensify, those who can deliver robust, interoperable identity infrastructure stand to gain both market share and the strategic advantage of enabling safer, more capable AI deployments across the enterprise landscape.
Guru Startups analyzes Pitch Decks using LLMs across 50+ points to assess market opportunity, product defensibility, and go-to-market viability, among other dimensions. Learn more at Guru Startups.